“sufficient action has not been taken to compensate victims, and to assure that similar forms of abusive experimentation would be prevented in the future, especially in newly emerging areas of technology and weapons development.”-9. Involuntary Human Scientific Experimentation in TORTURE IN THE UNITED STATES (Sklar) 1998 World Organization Against Torture USA

Posts tagged ‘Morton Sklar Human Testing Ban’

The Gap: Politicians and Reality

 

US Officials are in the dark about what Dr. Nick Begich has been warning us of.

London Underground Sign

Technologies for stimulating the brain and controlling the mind can have benefits, but they have a dark side that military and intelligence planners have been exploiting for decades“- Nick Begich.

If you have a car, do you let it sit in the garage?

The US military and DoD have an extensive arsenal of space and ground based technologies, NOT FOR the battlefield.

They are classified and speculation is that they may in fact be in use!

Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio wrote Bill HR 2977 Space Preservation Act (2001), expressed CONCERN and real THREATS of the use of these weapons and technologies.

HR 2977: Read the words space based weapons’, destroying….mental …bodily health inflict death energies directed at individuals or targeted populations‘:
Library of Congress:    http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2977.IH:  (or Google search:  2977 Kucinich Space Preservation Act Thomas)

“To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.”

HR 2977 Space Preservation Act (2001) quote Sec. 7:

  • (III) directing a source of energy (including molecular or atomic energy, subatomic particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation) against that object; or..
  • (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)–
  •  (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or (Kucinich HR 2977, Space Preservation Act, 2001)

There needs public debate on HAARP, and SPACE BASED COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS that can directly effect peoples moods, physical health, and mental states.

The High frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) IS A JOINT PROJECT OF US MILITARY, RAYTHEON AND OTHER MILITARY CONTRACTORS, MASKED AS A RESEARCH PROJECT: http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/factSheet.html

WHAT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT SAYS ABOUT H.A.A.R.P.  

RESOLUTION A4-0005/99 14 January

HAARP appears 24 times in the following document: 14 January 1999 A4-0005/99 REPORT (SEARCH IT) http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN

REPORT QUOTES:

  • T. whereas, despite the existing conventions, military research is ongoing on environmental manipulation as a weapon, as demonstrated for example by the Alaska-based HAARP (pg. 6 below link)
  • [Legal aspects of military activities  no. 24]  Considers HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Project) by virtue of its farreaching impact on the environment to be a global concern and calls for its legal, ecological and ethical implications to be examined by an international independent body before any further research and testing; regrets the repeated refusal of the United States Administration to send anyone in person to give evidence to the public hearing or any subsequent meeting held by its competent committee into the environmental and public risks connected with the high Frequency Active Auroral Research Project (HAARP) programme currently being funded in Alaska;”
  • Legal aspects of military activity no. 27  Calls for an international convention introducing a global ban on all developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of manipulation of human beings;( RESOLUTION A4-0005/99 14 January pg. 5: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:1999:128:0092:0096:EN:PDF; pg. 10: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+REPORT+A4-1999-0005+0+DOC+PDF+V0//EN)

 

In 2006, a study and investigative report was published by Sonoma University. This report was the results of work done by Professor Peter Phillips, Bridget Thornton and Lew Brown.

“This research explores the current capabilities of the US military to use electromagnetic (EMF) devices to harass, intimidate, and kill individuals and the continuing possibilities of violations of human rights by the testing and deployment of these weapons.”. -Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton, 2006, Sonoma University

As Study of the History of US Intelligence Community Human Rights
Violations and Continuing Research in Electromagnetic Weapons

US Electromagnetic Weapons and Human
Rights

By Peter Phillips, Lew Brown and Bridget Thornton

2006,  Sonoma State University, Project Censored, Media Freedom Foundation

http://www.projectcensored.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/ElectromegnaticWeapons.pdf

Surveillance, harassment and covert torture OF PEOPLE to test these weapons is a Nuremberg Breach and against US Title 18 Chapter 113C Torture: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_113C.html.

In 1998, a report prepared by THE COALITION AGAINST TORTURE AND RACIAL DISCRIMINATION, and “compiled and edited by Morton Sklar
Director, World Organization Against Torture USA, states the following regarding ‘newly emerging technology and weapons development:

  • “Considerable evidence recently has surfaced that the U.S. government, in past years, has conducted a number of what have been classified as “scientific” experiments on human subjects without their knowledge or consent.
  • Although the tests that have been publicly acknowledged took place some time ago, sufficient action has not been taken to compensate victims, and to assure that similar forms of abusive experimentation would be prevented in the future, especially in newly emerging areas of technology and weapons development.“

Morton Sklar (director, 1998, World Organization Against Torture: http://academic.udayton.edu/race/06hrights/georegions/northamerica/torture01.htm title: Torture in the United State, Report compiled by THE COALITION AGAINST TORTURE AND RACIAL DISCRIMINATION A Joint Working Group of Non-Governmental Civil and Human Rights Groups in the U.S.)

 

 

HOW SMART ARE OUR REPRESENTATIVES:
Contact officials: Demand that they have knowledge to answer Nick Begich’s claims and CONCERNS:   http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

As early as 1956, US Air Force Base, Rome, NY supplied  radar, radio frequency technology, for CIA sponsored remote electronic stimulation experiments on primates, as found in  FOIA documents on MK Ultra. To check this, see Colin A. Ross, CIA Doctors (2006), pg. 103 chpt 9.

J. F. Schapitz, in 1974, did a study with volunteers. The study involved using modulated microwaves to send signals to the brains of human subjects. Sending hypnotic suggestions, in conjunction with environmental, or external cues; recording brainwaves of a subject who had been put into a drugged state, and sending the very same signals into an different individual not under any drug influence. (see R. O. Becker, pg.321). In his book, Robert Becker states that as early as the 1960s, the CIA provided funding for reseach into remote influence of human cognition, consciousness, and behavior, by way of electromagnetic fields, EMR, modulated microwave, and extreemly low frequency, or ELF. It is possible that as early as the 1970s, by way of radar and satellite, the military, and the CIA, had capabilities to subject, unwittingly, humans to the technologies here in referred to, namely, what has been denoted in recent decades as non-lethal weapondry, but more specifically, technologies aimed at neurophysiological interference, influence, and control . (Robert Becker, The Body Electric, 1984)

It is now 2011!

The EU Parliament (quote below) has voiced concern about systems that are operational and run by the US military and perhaps private contractors, that have ability to direct effects to the mental and physical functioning of people, anywhere on the globe.

“That the US has undertaken a variety of _mind control programmes in the past such as MkULTRA and MkDELTA is a matter of public record and those using electromagnetic radiation such as PANDORA have been the focus of researchers in para-politics for many years.355

More recently, authors such as Begich and Roderick have alleged significant breakthroughs in the ability of military high frequency electromagnetic technologies to manipulate human behaviour.356

EU Parliament: report subtitled Appraisal of Technologies of Political Controlhttp://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/publications/studies/19991401a_en.pdf

How aware are our representatives? Do they know that these capabilities are at the hands of individuals within the US military and intelligence community. Consider the following “The National Security Act [of the United States] formally took effect in September 1947. Since that time, the Department of Defense, NSC, and CIA have grown steadily in terms of size”- History Channel. Furthermore, “The ‘black budget’ funds a covert world of unaccountable intelligence activities, covert military/intelligence operations and classified weapons programs. ….The key to uncovering the true size of the black budget are the chronic accounting anomalies in the DoD budget that reveal that as much as one trillion US dollars is annually being siphoned by the CIA into the DoD for secret distribution to various military intelligence agencies and the ‘deep black’ programs they respectively support. “-end quote. -Michael E. Salla, PhD Center for Global Peace/School of International Service American University”-

From Nick Begich’s reading of USAF 1982 Final Report On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000, as well as Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimestry Handbook, he states (pgs. 165-166) that ”What this seemed to say [in reference to a quote from Handbook] was that the objective of the research would be towards mind manipulation at a distance, where the military could alter what people thought and, at the same time know what they thought. (Begich, …HAARP, pg. 166)

Dr. Nick Begich: For readings regarding the Dr. Nick Begich findings, there are several books written by him, listed below. Reported in Angles Don’t Play this HAARP.

https://validconcern.files.wordpress.com/2011/01/mindthegap.jpg?w=300